查看完整版本: phy mc 97 #8

tabogirl910 2010-7-30 11:21 AM

phy mc 97 #8

答案岩,但我的做法同MARKING唔同
可以睇下我有冇錯嗎?
同埋我唔明MARKING的做法......
thxem46

[[i] 本帖最後由 tabogirl910 於 2010-7-30 12:45 PM 編輯 [/i]]

Simon 2010-7-30 11:30 AM

請post問題同埋你既做法

tabogirl910 2010-7-30 12:46 PM

回覆 #2 傑Simon 的帖子

唔好意思急得滞忘記左POST....

Simon 2010-7-30 01:51 PM

應該都岩既
不過最好標明係v[subtag]max[/subtag] = ωA
因為max. K.E. 搵到既係max. v

tabogirl910 2010-7-30 07:40 PM

但我唔明MARKING的3x10^-3=1/2kA^2

Simon 2010-7-30 08:23 PM

Max. K.E. = Max. P.E.
因為max. K.E. => P.E. = 0
max. P.E. => K.E. = 0

有錯請指吧!!!

tabogirl910 2010-7-30 09:18 PM

回覆 #6 傑Simon 的帖子

icic....thx

另外,我的做法咪代左X=0....
呢題係好耐之前做...我忘了點解我會代X=0...

kiwakwok 2010-7-31 09:58 AM

Hope that it helps

[attach]28547[/attach]

In the picture, the left part is what you have seen from the marking scheme, while the right part is what you have done.
The formulae in light blue are inter-convertible, and the formula in red is just the conversion factor.
Therefore, both methods are okay as they are more or less the same.

Note: Why substitute x = 0? For maximum velocity, the mass is at the equilibrium position.

tabogirl910 2010-7-31 10:48 AM

回覆 #8 kiwakwok 的帖子

it is of great use to me !
thanks a lot !
頁: [1]
查看完整版本: phy mc 97 #8