本區搜索:
Yahoo!字典
打印

[Core] Find mistakes - quadratic equation

Find mistakes - quadratic equation

Consider the quadratic equation x^2+kix+(k+1)(k-1)=0.
(a) Find the value or range of k such that the equation has repeated root.
(b) Find the value or range of k^2 such that the equation has two real roots.

A student gave the following answers.
(a) discriminant=0
(ki)^2-4(k+1)(k-1)=0
-5k^2+4=0
k^2=4/5
k=2/sqrt(5)

(b) discriminant>0
(ki)^2-4(k+1)(k-1)>0
-5k^2+4>0
k^2<4/5

Point out the student's mistake in each part.
本帖隱藏的內容需要回覆才可以瀏覽


[ 本帖最後由 桃子 於 2014-3-7 11:47 PM 編輯 ]
   

TOP

[隱藏]
This is not a equation
Why there is a "+" sign in-front of "0"?

TOP

回覆 2# ckh822 的帖子

haha, this should be a typo!
【DSE Maths】中大教育文憑 × 數學系畢業◆助你奪*升Lv~
首次以課題分班,10月開班招生,快d黎睇下~

導師簡介:按此進入

TOP

引用:
原帖由 ckh822 於 2014-3-7 11:39 PM 發表
This is not a equation
Why there is a "+" sign in-front of "0"?
typo
should be =0

TOP

引用:
原帖由 桃子 於 2014-3-7 23:29 發表
Consider the quadratic equation x^2+kix+(k+1)(k-1)=0.
(a) Find the value or range of k such that the equation has repeated root.
(b) Find the value or range of k^2 such that the equation has two rea ...
I wonder the discrimination formula can be used when there exists non-real coefficient in the quadratic equation

TOP

引用:
原帖由 thomas3253 於 2014-3-7 11:54 PM 發表

I wonder the discrimination formula can be used when there exists non-real coefficient in the quadratic equation
Yes for part (a) but no for part (b). Think about why..

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

真係唔知wo,求解!

TOP

留名睇答案,真係諗唔到
垃圾大學生路過

TOP

引用:
原帖由 桃子 於 2014-3-8 00:03 發表

Yes for part (a) but no for part (b). Think about why..
for quadratic equation y=ax^2+bx+c
the root is x=[-b+sqrt(b^2-4ac)]/2a or x=[-b-sqrt(b^2-4ac)]/2a

Now, in this question
x^2+kix+(k+1)(k-1)=0
x=[-(ki)+sqrt((ki)^2-4(k^2-1))]/2 or x=[-b-sqrt((ki)^2-4(k^2-1))]/2
x=[-(ki)+sqrt(-5k^2+4)]/2 or x=[-(ki)-sqrt(-5k^2+4)]/2

If both root are real,
we first consider -5k^2+4 is positive and ki is real=> k^2<4/5 and (k is pure imaginary or k=0)=>k^2<4/5 and k^2<=0 => k^2<=0

Then, if k^2>=4/5 , both ki and sqrt(-5k^2+4) will be imaginary.
The sum of two imaginary number equal to real number if they sum to 0.
So, k+sqrt(4-5k^2)=0 => k=-sqrt(4-5k^2) => k^2=4-5k^2 => 6k^2-4=0 =>k=sqrt(2/3) => k^2=2/3 < 4/5
Hence, the case do not satisfy the assumption.

=>k^2<=0

TOP

真係諗唔到 求解!

TOP

引用:
原帖由 桃子 於 2014-3-8 12:03 AM 發表

Yes for part (a) but no for part (b). Think about why..
To elaborate that, the following properties works for all quadratic equations.
1. If discriminant=0, then the equation has a repeated root.
2. If discriminant is non-zero, then the equation has two distinct roots.

The following properties works for quadratic equations with real coefficients.
1. If discriminant>0, then the equation has two real roots.
2. If discriminant<0, then the equation has two distinct non-real roots. (no real roots)

These properties can be easily derived by noting the roots are [-b+sqrt(delta)]/(2a) and [-b-sqrt(delta)]/(2a).

TOP

thxxxxxxxxxxxxx

TOP

see see

TOP

TOP

重要聲明:小卒資訊論壇 是一個公開的學術交流及分享平台。 論壇內所有檔案及內容 都只可作學術交流之用,絕不能用商業用途。 所有會員均須對自己所發表的言論而引起的法律責任負責(包括上傳檔案或連結), 本壇並不擔保該等資料之準確性及可靠性,且概不會就因有關資料之任何不確或遺漏而引致之任何損失或 損害承擔任何責任(不論是否與侵權行為、訂立契約或其他方面有關 ) 。